<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Google Docs posting to Wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-tag.com/2006/11/14/67/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-tag.com/2006/11/14/67/</link>
	<description>tech tricks</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jens</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-tag.com/2006/11/14/67/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-tag.com/2006/11/14/67/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Your right! I should definitely consider moving spellchecker to cons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right! I should definitely consider moving spellchecker to cons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-tag.com/2006/11/14/67/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-tag.com/2006/11/14/67/#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Interesting post! Never thought of using Google docs like that. Not to be pedantic, but if using the spellchecker is one of your Pros, why didn't you use it on the post? (Dics, af ad)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post! Never thought of using Google docs like that. Not to be pedantic, but if using the spellchecker is one of your Pros, why didn&#8217;t you use it on the post? (Dics, af ad)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.815 seconds -->
